View Full Version: threaty with Landisberg (proposed again)

The Empire of the Alexandrians > 3rd Imperial Parliament > threaty with Landisberg (proposed again)



Title: threaty with Landisberg (proposed again)


Matthieu Poiters - June 14, 2006 09:36 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
ARTICLE 1
There shall be a Perpetual State of mutual recognition and friendship between The Empire of the Alexandrians and the Landinberg. The two aforementioned nations shall be committed to a peaceful resolution of any and all issues that may occur to estrange and otherwise alienate them one from the other.

ARTICLE 2
Both Nations shall refrain from any aggressive, belligerent, or hostile act or policy, either overtly or covertly, directed against the other.

ARTICLE 3
The nation of Landinberg, shall respect the neutrality of the Empire of the Alexandrians. Therefore, if any disagreements occur between the nation of Landinberg and other nations, it shall be understood that the Empire of the Alexandrians being neutral shall take no official side in such matters, unless pursuant to foreign policy, an Act of the Imperial Parliament, or an Imperial Decree in Alexandria.

ARTICLE 4
The signatory parties shall respect the diplomatic envoys of each other, their diplomatic correspondence and their offices, as well as all other government structures of each other. having said this, we have a treaty to pass gentlemen. pete?

ARTICLE 5
The signatory Nations shall recognise any titles and other honors granted by their respective Leaders to their citizens and to other persons, and vice versa.

ARTICLE 6
This Treaty may only be amended, revised, enlarged and expanded upon the concurrence of both signatory Nations. Any contrary action or measure shall be null and void.

ARTICLE 7
This Treaty shall enter into force upon ratification by both signatory Nations' governments by whatever method is used in said nations.

ARTICLE 8
Either party may withdraw from this Treaty provided that seven days' written notice (defined as a post on the forums of both nations by the withdrawing nation's head of state, ratified by whatever legislative procedures are necessary) is given.


last time it appeared that the parliamentary reps were mistaken, they do have forums i have seen in the foreign affairs forums that the czar has asked enrique to showcase it again and so i did it. their forums i believe are now in Invisionfree like it states so in the FA forums. ( http://z7.invisionfree.com/Landingberg_Online/index.php? )

Poiters. MP for PN.

Pete James - June 14, 2006 10:43 PM (GMT)
meh they have 2 members, one of which is a forgin envoy. What do you guys think?

Matthieu Poiters - June 18, 2006 01:36 AM (GMT)


im all OUI.

Poiters. MP for PN.

Pete James - June 18, 2006 02:38 PM (GMT)
ABSTAIN

federico - June 21, 2006 04:00 AM (GMT)
We should take the Treaty signing a bit seroius, and not go around every Micronation signing treaties. We havent even discussed what is it so attractive from them to us. A treaty should be made so both signatories can gain something form the other, not just because they look like a cool micronation.

My vote NON

hard_right - June 22, 2006 01:17 PM (GMT)
After speaking with the current Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prince Enrique, he urged me that as his last act as Foreign Minister, that I extend my support to this treaty.

I think that we should give Langdinberg a chance, we could gain an ally though them - so I vote OUI.

Pete James - June 22, 2006 03:25 PM (GMT)
Passed by 2-1-1




Hosted for free by InvisionFree