View Full Version: Presenting Novasolum Treaty

The Empire of the Alexandrians > 2nd Imperial Parliament > Presenting Novasolum Treaty



Title: Presenting Novasolum Treaty
Description: Treaty Ratified


Emperor Edgard II - February 13, 2006 02:30 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
NOVASOLUM TREATY REGARDING SAFETY AND LIBERTY WITHIN AN AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

PREAMBLE

The Empire of Alexandria, the Republic of Anthelia, the Kingdom of Gotzborg, the Sovereign Imperial Republic of Natopia and the Confederate States of Rio Grande

ACKNOWLEDGING that their respective territories are in whole or partially situated on a same continent, which they shall henceforth call Novasolum and that such geographical bond naturally leads to the forging of a common destiny

DRAWING INSPIRATION from the the universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, freedom, democracy, equality and justice under the rule of law, which they all share

BELIEVING that the nations of Novasolum must continue along the path of civilisation, progress and prosperity, hence that they must strive for safety and liberty within an area of freedom, security and justice

Therefore, the Empire of Alexandria, the Republic of Anthelia, the Kingdom of Gotzborg, the Confederate States of Rio Grande and the Sovereign Imperial Republic of Natopia, hereafter referred to as the High Contracting Parties, agree as follows:

OBJECTIVE

1. The objective of the High Contracting Parties shall be to provide the citizens and the residents of their micronation with a high level of safety and liberty within an area of freedom, security and justice by:
- developing common action in the fields of police and judicial cooperation;
- preventing war and agression amongst one another;
- supporting eachother against acts of agression by a third micronation;
- guaranteeing the free movement for eachother’s citizens within one another’s territories;
- upholding fundamental human rights for their citizens and residents.


POLICE AND JUDICIAL COOPERATION

2. The High Contracting Parties shall prevent and combat crime, organised or otherwise, in particular (cyber)terrorism, through:
- closer cooperation between police forces, customs authorities and other competent authorities in the High Contracting Parties;
- closer cooperation between judicial and other competent authorities of the High Contracting Parties;
- approximation, where necessary, of rules on criminal matters in the High Contracting Parties.

3. This title shall not affect the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon High Contracting Parties with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security.

NON-AGRESSION

4. Notwithstanding every sovereign nation’s right to self-defence, the High Contracting Parties shall refrain from all acts of aggression and other uses of force against eachother. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, except for every sovereign nation’s right to self-defence, may serve as a justification for aggression and no territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.

5. Any time a third nation commits an act of agression against one of the High Contracting Parties or threatens to do so, the High Contracting Parties shall inform and consult one another in order to ensure that their influence is exerted as effectively as possible by means of concerted and convergent action. For this purpose they may adopt common positions. Common positions shall define the approach of the High Contracting Parties to a particular situation. The High Contracting Parties shall ensure that their national policies conform to the common positions. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, except for every sovereign nation’s right to self-defence, shall be accepted as a justification for aggression and no territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.

6. Aggression is the use of armed force by a micronation against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another micronation. Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall qualify as an act of aggression:

(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a micronation of the territory of another micronation, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another Micronation or part thereof;

(B) Bombardment by the armed forces of a Micronation against the territory of another Micronation or the use of any weapons by a Micronation against the territory of another Micronation;

© The blockade of the ports or coasts of a Micronation by the armed forces of another Micronation;

(d) An attack by the armed forces of a Micronation on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another Micronation;

(e) The use of armed forces of one Micronation which are within the territory of another Micronation with the agreement of the receiving Micronation, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;

(f) The action of a Micronation in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another Micronation, to be used by that other Micronation for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third Micronation;

(g) The sending by or on behalf of a Micronation of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another Micronation of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein;

(h) The unauthorized access by a Micronation or a person or group acting on behalf of that Micronation to the website, forum or other virtual infrastructure of another Micronation;

(i) The alteration or destruction by a Micronation or a person or group acting on behalf of that Micronation from the website, forum or other virtual infrastructure of another Micronation, or the content thereof.

(j) The use by a Micronation or a person or group acting on behalf of that Micronation of malicious online behaviour, forum busting weapons or spamming as means to destabilize a Micronation or overthrow its government.

The acts enumerated above are not exhaustive and the High Contracting Parties may in common consent determine that other acts constitute aggression under the provisions of this treaty.

FREE MOVEMENT FOR CITIZENS

7. The right of free movement for citizens shall entail the right, subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health, to move freely within and between the territory of high contracting parties and to remain on those territories. It shall also entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between citizens of the High Contracting Parties. This provision shall be directly applicable before any of the courts of the High Contracting Parties.

FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

8. The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the following rights and freedoms, which shall be directly applicable before any of the courts of the High Contracting Parties:
(a) The right to life and physical integrity. No person may be condemned to death nor be executed, nor be tortured, nor subjected to inhumane treatment.
(B) Freedom from slavery, servitude and forced labour, all of which are prohibited.
© The right to family life, privacy and property. Personally identifiable information, personal communications, assets and the domicile shall be respected.
(d) Freedom of religious belief and association, assembly, including the right to protest and for workers, the right to strike.
(e) Freedom of speech including written expression.
(f) The right to work and to engage in commerce, including the right to equitable working conditions
(g) For persons without resources, the right to a minimum wage.
(h) Equality before the law, and due process in adjudication under the law. Due process of justice includes a prompt and fair hearing before a competent court, the right to advocacy, the right to request a jury and the right to an effective remedy.

9. No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognized by article 8 other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

10. Insofar as this Chapter recognises fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the High Contracting Parties, those rights shall be interpreted in harmony with those traditions. Nothing in this Chapter shall be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognised by the constitutions of the High Contracting Parties.

RATIFYING AND DENOUNCING THE TREATY

11. The formal ratifications of this Treaty shall be communicated to the Executive Council of the Republic of Anthelia for registration. This Treaty shall be binding only upon those High Contracting Parties whose ratifications have been registered

12. The Treaty shall come into force one month after the date on which the ratifications of three High Contracting Parties have been registered.

13. A High Contracting Party which has ratified this Treaty may denounce it after the expiration of one year from the date on which the Treaty first comes into force, by an act communicated to the Executive Council of the Republic of Anthelia. Such denunciation shall not take effect until one month after the date on which it is registered.

14. Each High Contracting Party which has ratified the Treaty and which does not, within one month following the expiration of the period of one year mentioned in the preceding article, exercise the right of denunciation provided for in this Article, will be bound for another period of one year and, thereafter, may denounce this Convention at the expiration of each period of ten years under the terms provided for in this Article.

15. The Executive Council of the Republic of Anthelia shall notify all High Contracting Parties of the registration of all ratifications and acts of denunciation communicated by any of the High Contracting Parties.

Jacques de Beaufort - February 13, 2006 06:51 PM (GMT)
I think to things need to be modified to this treaty.

1. In the Preamble of the Treaty the Confederate States of Rio Grande are ennumered as one of the High Contracting Parties. But since this nation was annexed to the Empire of the Alexandrians I believe that the confederate states are already included under the sovereignty of the Empire. Therefore, they should be removed from the preamble.

2. In Chapter II Police and Judicial Cooperation there should be a refernce to the Novapol, stating that all police and judicial cooperation will be done through the said organism.

I yield,

Joshua Jackson - February 13, 2006 11:07 PM (GMT)


This treaty was of course done before Novapol and the annexation. If the member nations would be willing to admend or allow further modifications to the treaty, so much the better.

I support this treaty. As a resident of first the Confederation and now the Empire, I fine it comforting that we can have people who we can call allies or better friends surrounding us. When we see superpowers plotting and feuding, it's good to know we can have an area where we can just have peace.

Emperor Edgard II - February 14, 2006 06:46 PM (GMT)
The treaty was done before Novapol was created and the annexation. I believe the issue was brought up in the Novasolum Convention in Geneva, but I'm not sure what happened.

I shall take this matter up to the Anthelians.

Jacques de Beaufort - February 15, 2006 07:48 PM (GMT)
Thank you Your Majesty.

I will put the ratification of this Treaty on hold, until you can provide us with news from our friends.

Sincerely,


RATIFICATION TEMPORARILY ON HOLD

Jacques de Beaufort - March 2, 2006 05:53 PM (GMT)
Your Imperial Majesty,

Have you had word from the Anthelians regarding this issue. We would like to proceed with it as fast as possible, but we need their response.

Sincerely,

Emperor Edgard II - March 2, 2006 06:45 PM (GMT)
I have not had a chance to communicate with them. I shall do so immediately.

Jacques de Beaufort - March 2, 2006 10:13 PM (GMT)
Thank you Your Majesty,

Sincerely,

Jacques de Beaufort - March 18, 2006 03:16 AM (GMT)
I have been told that the ammendments are to be introduced to the signatory members of the Treaty, and not by Parliament therefore, it is our duty to ratify this treaty. Voting starts.

Voting Options:

Yes
No
Abstain

Sincerely,

Jacques de Beaufort - March 18, 2006 03:19 AM (GMT)
YES

Joshua Jackson - March 18, 2006 06:11 AM (GMT)


Oui

Pete James - March 18, 2006 12:44 PM (GMT)
Oui

hard_right - March 20, 2006 06:58 PM (GMT)
Oui

Cardinal Morales - March 21, 2006 04:51 PM (GMT)
Oui

Jean Michel Leclerc - March 22, 2006 09:07 AM (GMT)
YES

Matthieu Poiters - March 27, 2006 12:19 PM (GMT)


OUI

PM.Poiters.For Alexandria.

Jacques de Beaufort - March 28, 2006 09:06 PM (GMT)
Amazing!!! This treaty is ratified by unanimous vote. Congratulations!!

Sincerely,

TREATY RATIFIED




Hosted for free by InvisionFree